Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 N.C. 644 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
7
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Parker (2001), Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp. (1999)

73 state decisions

380199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Idaho v. Wright · White v. Illinois · United States v. Inadi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]ecause the United States Constitution is binding on the states, the rights it guarantees must be applied to every citizen by the courts of North Carolina, so no citizen will be `accorded lesser rights' no matter how we construe the state Constitution.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a hearsay] statement not specifically covered by any of the foregoing exceptions but having equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, if the court determines that (A) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (B) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (C) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]here hearsay proffered by the prosecution comes within a firmly rooted exception to the hearsay rule, the Confrontation Clause of the North Carolina Constitution is not violated . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.