348 N.J. Super. 164 - Dzwonar v. McDevitt’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 401 (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959) · 29 U.S.C. § 411
Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn · Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25 · Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An employer shall not take any retaliatory action against an employee because the employee does any of the following: c. Objects to, or refuses to participate in any activity, policy or practice which the employee reasonably believes: (1) is in violation of a law, or a rale or regulation promulgated pursuant to law ...; (2) is fraudulent or criminal; or (3) is incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy concerning the public health, safety or welfare or protection of the environment. [N.J.S.A. 34:19-3.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dzwonar v. McDevitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.