348 N.J. Super. 31 - In Re EMB’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 district · 19 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “DYFS argued that the Family Part and child placement review board had no jurisdiction to review the placement plan; that an administrative appeal by the grandparents from the DYFS foster parent adoption plan was being processed and constituted adequate review of its placement decision; and that the grandparents' ultimate remedy would be an appeal to this court from any adverse administrative decision. [ Id. at 40, 791 A. 2d 256 .]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. E.R. · 364 N.J. Super. 263 - In Re CR

2. “the issue for resolution is the ultimate permanency issue—among those bonded to the children, who should be permitted to adopt? That issue is for the Family Part to determine through application of the procedures set forth in the Act for review of the permanency placement plan.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 364 N.J. Super. 263 - In Re CR

3. “the administrative review process offered by DYFS is not the type of plenary review desirable for resolution of the fundamental issue of whether a permanency placement plan effectuates the best interest of children.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 364 N.J. Super. 263 - In Re CR