Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 NW2D 243 - State v. Allen

State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably State v. McKettrick (1992), Jones v. State (1991)

32 state decisions

2201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Robinson · State v. Schrier · State v. Lass · State v. Miles · State v. Fuhrmann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the evidence was discovered after the verdict; (2) it could not have been discovered earlier in the exercise of due diligence; (3) the evidence is material to the issues in the case and not merely cumulative or impeaching; and (4) the evidence probably would have changed the result of the trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The jury’s verdict is binding upon a reviewing court unless there is an absence of substantial evidence in the record to sustain it. In making this determination, we consider the whole record, including that evidence which is favorable to defendant or detracts from the weight of the State’s case. Where the evidence is in conflict, however, the jury is empowered to resolve those conflicts in accordance with its own views as to the credibility of the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.