Keogan v. Bergh’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2001
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barnum v. Ewing · Chicago and North Western Railway Co. v. Schmidt · State v. Cody · Sioux Valley Hospital Ass'n v. Jones County · Application of Northern States Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The concept of an “aggrieved party” is not new to this Court ... the first in-depth analysis of “aggrieved party” regarding a test for standing was made by this Court in an appeal from a board of county commissioners’ decision. Barnum v. Ewing, 53 S.D. 47 , 220 N.W. 135 (1928). In Barnum we set forth the following test: “[W]e think [‘any person aggrieved’] can only include such persons when they are able affirmatively to show that they are ‘aggrieved’ in the sense that [ ... ] they suffer the denial of some claim of right either of person or property....” Id. at 53 , 220 N.W. at 138 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Thus, the circuit court should determine anew the question ... independent of the county commissioners’ decision. The court exercises independent judgment. This means that the trial court should determine the issues before it on appeal as .if they had been brought originally. The court must review the evidence, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and render judgment independent of the agency proceedings. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“denial of some claim of right either of person or property....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.