State v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statutes generally only describe the person against whom force must be used as 'any person' or 'another person.' " State v. Hamilton , 348 Or. 371 , 233 P.3d 432 , 435 (2010). Thus, "the legislature deliberately chose not to limit the reach of the robbery statutes to the use of force against the owner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hen the same conduct or criminal episode, though violating only one statutory provision involves two or more victims, there are as many separately punishable offenses as there are victims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if in the course of committing or attempting to commit theft ... the person uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person with the intent of: (a) Preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to retention thereof immediately after the taking; or (b) Compelling the owner of such property or another person to deliver the property....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.