Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 Or. 95 - State v. Blake

State v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if one offense contains X elements, and another offense contains X + 1 elements, the former offense does not contain an element that is not also found in the latter offense. In that situation, under ORS 161.067(1), there is only one separately punishable offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “an accomplice theory of liability is not itself an independent offense. Accomplice liability makes a person who aids or abets a crime liable for that crime even though the accomplice may not have committed any of the acts that the crime entails.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “each statutory provision * * * requires proof of an element that the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.