State v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if one offense contains X elements, and another offense contains X + 1 elements, the former offense does not contain an element that is not also found in the latter offense. In that situation, under ORS 161.067(1), there is only one separately punishable offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Gray“an accomplice theory of liability is not itself an independent offense. Accomplice liability makes a person who aids or abets a crime liable for that crime even though the accomplice may not have committed any of the acts that the crime entails.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Kimbrough“each statutory provision * * * requires proof of an element that the other does not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Gray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.