Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 P3D 415 - FFJ v. ST

FFJ v. ST’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Basolo v. Basolo · Pace v. Pace · Triggs v. Triggs · Daniel L. Stevens v. Kacie J. Stevens · Scherer v. Scherer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(olur rule is that the credibility. of witnesses, the weight of the evidence, and conflicts in the evidence must be resolved by the finder of fact[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This Court ... does not reweigh evidence. Instead, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.