Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 Pa. Super. 297 - Commonwealth v. Yost

348 Pa. Super. 297 - Commonwealth v. Yost’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2008

10 state decisions

40198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Rodgers · 294 Pa. Super. 229 - Commonwealth v. Bey · Commonwealth v. Jenkins · 294 Pa. Super. 446 - Commonwealth v. Parente · 310 Pa. Super. 385 - Commonwealth v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule, the court may order such party to permit discovery or inspection, may grant a continuance, or may prohibit such party from introducing evidence not disclosed, other than testimony of the defendant, or it may enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““To afford defendant the opportunity to discover evidence which he did not know existed, as well as to seek possession of evidence of which he was aware.” 348 Pa. Super, at 304, 502 A.2d at 220 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.