Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 S.C. 436 - Olmstead v. Shakespeare

Olmstead v. Shakespeare’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co. · Caton v. Winslow Bros. & Smith Co. · Peay v. U.S. Silica Co. · Lake v. Reeder Construction Co. · Caughman v. Columbia Y. M. C. A.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]orkers' compensation statutes are construed liberally in favor of coverage. It follows that any exception to workers' compensation coverage must be narrowly construed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.