Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 S.C. 611 - State v. Bullard

State v. Bullard’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. United States · Hartman v. United States · Carter v. State · State v. Owens · Browning v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “charges the crime substantially in the language ... of the statute prohibiting the crime or so plainly that the nature of the offense charged may be easily understood.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if the offense be a statutory offense, that the offense be alleged to be contrary to the statute in such case made and provided”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]gainst the peace and dignity of the State and, contrary to the statute in such case made and provided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.