Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 S.C. 84 - Hardee v. Hardee

Hardee v. Hardee’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cherry v. Thomasson · Stevenson v. Stevenson · Rutherford v. Rutherford · Moseley v. Mosier · Scherer v. Scherer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. That all properties of any kind or nature, real, personal or mixed, wheresoever the same may be located, which belong to each party, shall be and forever remain the personal estate of the said party, including all interest, rents, and properties which may accrue therefrom unless otherwise so stated in this Agreement. 4. That each party, in the event of separation or divorce, shall have no right against the other by way of claims for support, alimony, attorney’s fees, cost, or division of property, except as specifically stated hereinafter. 7. It is specifically understood and agreed that should a separation or divorce occur between the parties, each of the parties would maintain all of their property as if the marriage had never occurred and each of the parties will have no interest whatsoever in the property of the other except as hereinafter provided. 9. The provisions contained herein shall in no way affect the property, whether real, personal or mixed which shall be acquired by the parties, whether titled separately or jointly, subsequent to the date of this Agreement. 10. ... Each party acknowledges that they shall have no right against the other by way of claim for support, alimony, attorney fees, costs or division of property, except as stated within this agreement. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “At the time Wife signed the agreement, she had serious health problems, including diabetes and sponge kidney disease. The premarital agreement specifically noted Wife’s health problems. It was completely foreseeable to Wife that her health would worsen. Wife’s attorney advised Wife not to sign the agreement because of her health problems. Although it is unfortunate that Wife’s health has deteriorated, we do not find that fact alone sufficient to justify nullifying a contract Wife freely and voluntarily signed, fully aware that under its terms she would not receive any spousal support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) Was the agreement obtained through fraud, duress or mistake, or through misrepresentation or non-disclosure of material facts? (2) Is the agreement unconscionable? (3) Have the facts and circumstances changed since the agreement was executed so as to make its enforcement unfair and unreasonable?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.