State v. Braverman’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2016
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Chambers v. Mississippi · Pope v. State · Canada v. State · 150 So. 2d 281 - Peel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) The discovery of new evidence obtained since the nolo pleas establishing among other things that the defendant was physically unable to have committed the assault with intent to commit murder, which evidence if known at the time of the nolo pleas would have caused the defendant not to have entered the nolo pleas; (2) The state failed to supply the defendant with certain pre-trial discovery; and (3) The defendant entered his nolo pleas upon an honest misunderstanding as to the expected sentence.” State v. Braverman, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Braverman v. State“Only upon a showing that the ends of justice would be served can 'newly discovered evidence constitute a basis for withdrawing such pleas prior to sentencing. We believe; that such a showing should be reserved to those cases where evidence has been uncovered subsequent to the plea which raises a' substantial question as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Oür láw should never be so inflexible that a showing of innocence would be tó no avail in withdrawing a nolo contendere or guilty plea prior to sentencing:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““One of the other reasons I granted a new trial — and I was of a mind all the way to grant it — I think the defendant was laboring under the apprehension originally that there was a deal made in this case and I don’t think that was fully overcome, notwithstanding his answers on voir dire, the information before I accepted the plea.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Braverman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.