Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 So. 2d 420 - David v. State

348 So. 2d 420 - David v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 1979
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Childers v. State · Ogilvie v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “then the comment thus interpreted or construed violated the prohibition of the rule. What could be a clearer reference to the defendant's silence than the prosecutor's comment: `Why didn't he [referring to the defendant] say anything about ...' There is no need to resort to possible interpretations or constructions of the prosecutorial comment when there is such a direct reference to the defendant's silence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.