Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 S.W.2d 787 - Gourley v. Fields

Gourley v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1983
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1983

7 state decisions

30196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farmers' Seed & Gin Co. v. Brooks · MacDonald v. Follett · Stafford v. Stafford · Johnson v. Wood · Johnson v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Such hearing, unless the parties agree upon the date, shall not be had until a copy of such controverting plea, including a copy of such notation thereon, shall have been mailed by registered mail to the defendant or his attorney at the post office address stated in such plea of privilege, or shall have been delivered to defendant or his attorney, at least ten days before the date set for hearing, after which the court shall promptly hear such plea of privilege and enter judgment thereon * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The failure of a plaintiff to procure a prompt determination of a plea of privilege or to prove that the business of a court did not permit the plea to be promptly heard at the term therefore does not as a matter of law- constitute a waiver of plaintiff’s right to contest the plea of privilege.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.