Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 348 SW3D 840 - State v. Anderson

State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Willey v. United States · State v. Dulany · Sims v. Barkley · State v. Brown · State v. Baumruk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether the trial court abused its discretion, an appellate court must first consider what prejudice the State would have suffered as a result of the discovery violation and second, whether the remedy resulted in fundamental unfairness to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule [25.18] offers sanctions for failure to comply with discovery rules, and exclusion of a witness is one such sanction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Discovery rules help eliminate surprise and allow both sides to become aware of trial witnesses and evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.