Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

348 S.W.3d 865

Docket Nos. WD 73599, WD 73600.

Df v. Dmp

D.F.; R.E.H., Respondent, v. D.M.P., Appellant.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2011.

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-09-27

Decided 2011-09-27

¶1David M. Paine, Riverside, MO, pro se.

¶2Deborah Fones, Riverside, MO, pro se.

¶3Richard E. Hamm, Riverside, MO, pro se.

¶4Before: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., and ALOK AHUJA and KAREN KING MITCHELL, JJ.

¶5

ORDER

¶6PER CURIAM:

¶7D.M.P. appeals two judgments issued by the Circuit Court of Platte County, entering full orders of protection in proceedings brought by petitioners R.E.H. and D.F. pursuant to the Adult Abuse Act, §§ 455.005 through 455.090, RSMo. D.M.P. contends that the judgments as to each petitioner are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

/348/sw3d/865 · .json · Public domain