348 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Lock’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The double jeopardy provisions of the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions prohibit multiplicitous charges. Multiplicity occurs when the State charges more than one count for a single criminal offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 629 - State v. Fennell

2. “We review multiplicity claims according to a well-established two-pronged methodology. First, the court determines whether the offenses are identical in law and fact using the 'elements-only' test”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 629 - State v. Fennell

3. “Whether an individual's constitutional right to be free from double jeopardy has been infringed is a question of law that we review de novo .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 629 - State v. Fennell