Dane County v. Sheila W.’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health · 102 Wis. 2d 539 - Eberhardy v. Circuit Court for Wood County · 209 Wis. 2d 112 - State Ex Rel. Angela M.W. v. Kruzicki · 64 Wis. 2d 691 - City of Racine v. J-T Enterprises of America, Inc. · Cardwell v. Bechtol
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this case, no determination of this court will have any practical legal effect upon an existing controversy because the order being appealed has expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when a determination is sought upon some matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical legal effect upon a then existing controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.