Continental Baking Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Utah Pie Company, a Utah Corporation, Carnation Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Utah Pie Company, a Utah Corporation, Pet Milk Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Utah Pie Company, a Utah Corporation’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.2d 122 · 1965
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1987 · most notably The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman (1969), 37 Ill. 2d 494 - Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern Railroad (1967)
32 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Continental Ore Company v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co. · Slocum v. New York Life Insurance · Muschany v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whenever a motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all the evidence is denied or for any reason is not granted.... [A] party who has moved for a directed verdict may move to have the verdict and any judgment entered thereon set aside and to have judgment entered in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trujillo v. Goodman“"... Antitrust legislation is concerned primarily with the health of the competitive process, not with the individual competitor who must sink or swim in competitive enterprise. But as a necessary incident thereto, it is concerned with preda tory price cutting which has the effect of eliminating or crippling a competitor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.