Robertson v. Udall’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.2d 195 · 1965
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1982
12 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Central Airlines, Inc. · California Company v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior · Harvey Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]ur duty to defer to the Secretary's interpretation of his own regulations, so long as that interpretation is not plainly beyond the bounds of reason or authority, is well-defined. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.