Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.2d 20 - United States v. Hoffa

United States v. Hoffa’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.2d 20 · 1965

Citation profile

275
cited by 275 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

193 federal appellate · 13 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 275 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2014 · most notably United States v. Nixon (1974), Hoffa v. United States (1966)

193 federal appellate · 13 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 16 states

1310196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Wong Sun v. United States · Swain v. State of Alabama · Costello v. United States · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 275 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “closing argument of the [p]rosecutor must be considered in the light of the previous arguments of defense counsel in order to determine whether there was provocation for what the [p]rosecutor said.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a [rebuttable] presumption that each witness, including the parties, has sworn to the truth and it was the duty of the jury to reconcile conflicting statements if they could, but if they could not, they were the exclusive judges of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a separate instruction with particular reference to the testimony of an informer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.