Evans v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.2d 653 · 1965
Citation profile
30 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 1998 · most notably United States v. Roselli (1970), United States v. Pepe (1984)
30 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 4401 · 26 U.S.C. § 4411 · 26 U.S.C. § 4412
Relies on Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · Ingram v. United States · International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Anderson · United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. · Travis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not so technical, or ambiguous, as to require a specific definition”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““If the requirement that the defendants must be alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions is regarded as requiring that the same defendants must be charged in every criminal act of a series of acts or transactions, it would negate the second sentence of 8(b) allowing the omission of a defendant or defendants from any count.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.