United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.2d 94 · 1965
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 1995 · most notably United States v. Hemmen (1995), Randall v. H. Nakashima & Co. (1976)
15 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aquilino v. United States · United States v. Bess · Commissioner v. Stern · Glass City Bank of Jeanette Pa v. United States · United States v. Brosnan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a new levy would seem necessary to reach the cash surrender value when it is eventually demanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.