Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.2d 940 - Rufus Alonzo Thomason v. John H. Klinger

Rufus Alonzo Thomason v. John H. Klinger’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.2d 940 · 1965

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
April 1995
most recently cited

19 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 1995

19 federal appellate ·

1201965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from California Central District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Daugharty v. Gladden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except where necessary to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice, ... an appellant may not urge, as a ground for reversal, a theory which he did not present [to the district court].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.