Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.3d 1039 - Uwase v. Ashcroft

Uwase v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.3d 1039 · 2003

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Diallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Georgis v. Ashcroft · Krouchevski v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The testimony of the applicant, if credible, may be sufficient to sustain the burden of proof without corroboration.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[c]orroborating evidence is essential to bolster an otherwise unconvincing case,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be supported by specific, cogent reasons that bear a legitimate nexus to the finding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.