Hill v. Morrison’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.3d 1089 · 2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Williams v. Warden (2013), Abdullah v. Hedrick (2004)
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russel William Burket v. Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections · Charles v. Chandler · United States v. Lurie · United States v. Asch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application for a writ of habeas corpus in [sic] behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section, shall not be entertained if it appears that the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the court which sentenced him, or that such court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abdullah v. Hedrick“newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“provides the court of incarceration as having subject matter jurisdiction over a collateral attack on a conviction or sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.