Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.3d 1187 - Morrissey v. Stuteville

Morrissey v. Stuteville’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.3d 1187 · 2003

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
December 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Malone v. United States Postal Service · Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. · Su v. C Su · In Re Dennis Leroy Saxman · Myers v. Shekter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “did not explicitly mention the possibility of alternative sanctions, the inadequacy of the record and the briefing afforded the BAP little choice but to affirm summarily, as the memorandum made clear.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`the selection of the sanction to be imposed must take into consideration the impact of the sanction and the alternatives available to achieve assessment of the penalties in conformity with fault'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the relative culpability of the appellant and his attorney, because dismissal may inappropriately punish the appellant for the neglect of his counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.