Brownlee v. DynCorp’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.3d 1343 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2324 · 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1031 · 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1295
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Mead Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. · Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn · Time, Inc. v. Firestone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(e) Specific costs not allowable. — (1) The following costs are not allowable under a covered contract: ***** (O) Costs incurred by a contractor in connection with any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding commenced by the United States or a State, to the extent provided in subsection (k). * * * * # (k) Proceeding costs not allowable.— (1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, costs incurred by a contractor in connection with any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding commenced by the United States or a State are not allowable as reimbursable costs under a covered contract if the proceeding (A) relates to a violation of, or failure to comply with, a Federal or State statute or regulation, and (B) results in a disposition described in paragraph (2). (2) A disposition referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is any of the following: ‡ ‡ ‡ (C) In the case of any civil or administrative proceeding, the imposition of a monetary penalty by reason of the violation or failure referred to in paragraph (1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In Chevron, the Court held that courts reviewing agency interpretations of statutes must answer two questions: (1) `whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue,' and if not, (2) `whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the government could have appealed from the... Board['s entitlement] decision at the time it was rendered,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.