Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.3d 162 - Hinkel v. England

Hinkel v. England’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.3d 162 · 2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
December 2013
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 5 U.S.C. § 1214 · 5 U.S.C. § 2301 (Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002) · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 5101 · 5 U.S.C. § 5106 · 5 U.S.C. § 5107 · 5 U.S.C. § 5112

Relies on United States v. Testan · Carducci v. Regan · Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co. · Stehney v. Perry · Haneke v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.