United States v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.3d 18 · 2003
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2023
13 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (§ 242 of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Massiah v. United States · Custis v. United States · United States v. Mala · United States v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“apportion liability among defendants according to culpability or capacity to pay, or, in the alternative, [may] make each defendant liable for the full amount of restitution by imposing joint and several liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under Brady, the government is required to produce to defendants exculpatory and impeachment evidence that is in its custody, possession, and control....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.