Baldwin v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.3d 549 · 2003
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Stormo v. Barnhart (2004), Guilliams v. Barnhart (2005)
14 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission · Polaski v. Heckler · Benskin v. Bowen · Cruse v. Bowen · Cline v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In evaluating a claimant's RFC, the ALJ is not limited to considering medical evidence, but is required to consider at least some supporting evidence from a professional.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Dykes v. Apfel, 223 F.3d 865 , 867 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), must support the determination of the claimant's RFC, and the ALJ should obtain medical evidence that addresses the claimant's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and an individual's own description of his limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stormo v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.