Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.3d 558 - United States v. Turnbull

United States v. Turnbull’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.3d 558 · 2003

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

120200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cruz · United States v. Stuckey · United States v. Purdy · United States v. Herrera · United States v. McIntosh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who uses a controlled substance and has lost the power of self-control with reference to the use of controlled substance; and any person who is a current user of a controlled substance in a manner other than as prescribed by a licensed physician. Such use is not limited to the use of drugs on a particular day, or within a matter of days or weeks before, but rather that the unlawful use has occurred recently enough to indicate that the individual is actively engaged in such conduct....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[CJourts generally agree the law runs the risk of being unconstitutionally vague without a judicially-created temporal nexus between the gun possession and the regular drug use.”). 7 . United States v. Purdy, 264 F.3d 809 , 812-13 (9th Cir.2001) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.