Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 F.3d 563 - Depover v. Barnhart

Depover v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

349 F.3d 563 · 2003

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
April 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Page v. Astrue (2007), Harris v. Barnhart (2004)

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · Roe v. Chater · Anderson v. Shalala · Haynes v. Shalala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The adjudicator must give full consideration to all of the evidence presented relating to subjective complaints, including the claimant's prior work record, and observations by third parties and treating and examining physicians. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Subjective complaints may be discounted if there are inconsistencies in the record as a whole.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the most [a claimant] can still do despite”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.