United States v. Mutuc’s Empirical Analysis
349 F.3d 930 · 2003
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152 · 18 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Morris v. Slappy · Gierlinger v. Gleason · United States v. Irorere
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A successful discharge in bankruptcy would have left the creditors without recourse against Mutuc; it follows that Mutuc intended a loss equal to the amount to be discharged in bankruptcy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a friendly and happy attorney-client relationship,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.