Faruki v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 1041 · 22 U.S.C. § 902 · 8 U.S.C. § 1401 (§ 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1430 (§ 319 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1432 (§ 321 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1434
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · United States v. O'Brien · Shapiro v. Thompson · Bolling v. Sharpe · Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“foreign-born American citizens at birth who have never set foot in America face no similar barrier when they decide to come here, perhaps for the first time, to take the Foreign Service entrance examinations”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Tiwari v. Mattis“grants citizenship to an immigrant and then, solely on the basis of his original foreign status, proceeds to give him second-class, more burdensome treatment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Tiwari v. Mattis“a citizen of the United States and has been such for at least ten years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tiwari v. Mattis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.