State v. Ashbaugh’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
40 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A seizure of a person occurs under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution : (a) if a law enforcement officer intentionally and significantly restricts, interferes with, or otherwise deprives an individual of that individual's liberty or freedom of movement; or (b) if a reasonable person under the totality of the circumstances would believe that (a) above has occurred.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“is the imposition, either by physical force or through some 'show of authority,' of some restraint on the individual's liberty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'arrests'[,] which are restraints on an individual's liberty that are steps toward charging individuals with a crime[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.