State v. Kellar’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 district · 6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall order that a person's driving privileges be permanently revoked if the person is convicted of felony driving while under the influence of intoxicants in violation of ORS 813.010 or if the person is convicted for a third or subsequent time of any of the following offenses in any combination:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hamann“(C) A driving offense in another jurisdiction that involved operating a vehicle while having a blood alcohol content above that jurisdiction's permissible blood alcohol content.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hamann“(ii) The statutory counterpart to ORS 813.010 in another jurisdiction. *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hamann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.