Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 92 Okla. Crim. 182 - Martin v. State · 90 Okla. Crim. 423 - Chambless v. State · 95 Okla. Crim. 280 - Le Blanc v. State · Sanders v. State · Cox v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A defendant in a criminal case may waive any right not inalienable, given him by the Constitution or by the statute, either by. express agreement or conduct, or by such failure to insist upon it in seasonable time as will operate as an es-toppel to his afterwards setting it up against the state.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sarsycki v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.