Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 So. 2d 187 - Stripling v. State

349 So. 2d 187 - Stripling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
5
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2003 · most notably Brown v. Wainwright (1981), 458 So. 2d 750 - Parker v. State (1984)

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

2401977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Geders v. United States · Sears v. United States · Henderson v. United States · Louette v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`inconsistencies in defenses in criminal cases are allowable so long as the proof of one does not necessarily disprove the other.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 613 So. 2d 1362 - Kiernan v. State · 395 So. 2d 1207 - Mellins v. State
  2. “the general principles adopted by the Court [in Geders] are fully applicable to the analysis of any order barring communication between a defendant and his attorney, at least where that communication would not interfere with the orderly and expeditious progress of the trial. [Emphasis in original.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Jackson v. United States
  3. “It is a general rule that a party does not waive his previous objection to the admission of improper, illegal or incompetent evidence merely by cross-examining the witness with relation to the objectionable matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Dupree v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.