Fischler v. Askew’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1987
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 320 So. 2d 2 - Erwin v. STATE, DEPT. OF P. & OR, ETC., BD OF DENTISTRY · 265 So. 2d 363 - In re Rassner · Florida Bar v. Penny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Permanent revocation is the extreme penalty that may be imposed. In order to sustain such an order it must be supported by competent, substantial evidence. If a stipulation is to form the basis for such an order, the terms thereof and the petitioner’s agreement thereto must appear clearly on the record. The stipulation relied on here is insufficient in both respects, and instead reveals a lack of agreement, as well as a possible misunderstanding of the effect of any agreement. Such a stipulation cannot be a substitute for competent substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.