Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 SO2D 286 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 1992
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1992

14 state decisions

90197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Agurs · Stovall v. Denno · Beck v. State of Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The proper standard of materiality must reflect our overriding concern with the justice of the finding of guilt. Such a finding is permissible only if supported by evidence establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It necessarily follows that if the omitted evidence creates a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist, constitutional error has been committed. This means that the omission must be evaluated in the context of the entire record. If there is no reasonable doubt about guilt whether or not the additional evidence is considered, there is not justification for a new trial. On the other hand, if the verdict is already of questionable validity, additional evidence of relatively minor importance might be sufficient to create a reasonable doubt."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person when: (3) The peace officer has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed an offense although not in the presence of the officer . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.