349 So. 2d 620 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1982
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Echols v. State · 42 Ala. App. 567 - Horsley v. State · 57 Ala. App. 281 - Burns v. State · Ex parte Brannan · Burr v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Ex parte Brannan, 41 Ala.App. 500 , 139 So.2d 349 and Horsley v. State, 42 Ala.App. 567 , 172 So.2d 56 , this Court held that to obtain coram nobis relief from a conviction on the ground of perjured testimony the testimony must be shown to have been knowingly used by the prosecution and the convict must not have been negligent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Goodman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.