Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 U.S. 133 - In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites

In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

4,137
cited by 4,137 later decisions
161
cited 161 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
January 2026
most recently cited

1,284 federal appellate · 225 district · 1,520 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4,137 later decisions (161 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Richardson v. Perales (1971)

1,284 federal appellate · 225 district · 1,520 state decisions — followed in 50 states

851019551960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tumey v. State of Ohio · In re Oliver · Offutt v. United States · Cooke v. United States

Cited together with Tumey v. State of Ohio · Offutt v. United States · Withrow v. Larkin · Ward v. Village of Monroeville · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4,137 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A fair trial in a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process.”
    298 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any judge of its courts of record to act as a so-called `one-man grand jury.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.