State v. Tramell E. Starks’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

36 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “substantial, not just conceivable, likelihood of a different result.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 629 - State v. Luckett · 385 Wis. 2d 212 - State v. Kyles

2. “To prove constitutional prejudice, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 385 Wis. 2d 212 - State v. Kyles

3. “pleading standard for the deficiency prong of the Strickland test in Wisconsin for criminal defendants alleging in a habeas petition that they received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel due to counsel's failure to raise an issue. Stated differently, the court said that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Andres Romero-Georgana