Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 349 WIS2D 327 - State v. Demone Alexander

State v. Demone Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · United States v. Zannino · Kentucky v. Stincer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he mere occurrence of an ex parte conversation between a trial judge and a juror does not constitute a deprivation of any constitutional right. The defense has no constitutional right to be present at every interaction between a judge and a juror, nor is there a constitutional right to have a court reporter transcribe every such communication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The constitutional right to presence is rooted to a large extent in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, but we have recognized that this right is protected by the Due Process Clause in some situations where the defendant is not actually confronting witnesses or evidence against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether the defendant could meaningfully participate, whether he [or she] would gain anything by attending, and whether the presence of the defendant would be counterproductive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.