State v. Lancellotta’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““[1] the promptness of the continuance motion and the length of time requested; [2] the age and intricacy of the case; [3] the inconvenience to the parties, wit nesses, * * * counsel, and the court; [4] whether the request appears to be legitimate or merely contrived foot-dragging; [5] whether the defendant contributed to the circumstances giving rise to the request; [6] whether the defendant in fact has other competent and prepared trial counsel ready to pinch-hit; * * * and [7] any other relevant factor made manifest by the record.” Id. (quoting Powell, 6 A.3d at 1087 ).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Charles Mitchell

2. “[t]he burden of proof on the state at a probation violation hearing is much lower than that which exists in a criminal trial-the state need only show that reasonably satisfactory evidence supports a finding that the defendant has violated his or her probation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Washington

3. “whether or not the defendant has breached a condition of his or her probation by failing to keep the peace or remain on good behavior.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Washington