¶1Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered June 2, 2005, convicting him of criminal usury in the first degree, criminal usury in the second degree, and coercion in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
¶3Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
¶4The defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony regarding the defendant’s wealth or class, denigrated the defense counsel by impugning his integrity, and misled the jury during summation, are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, those contentions, as well as the defendant’s remaining contentions, are without merit. Miller, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.