Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 1976
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Flowers v. Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. · Jackson v. State · Hawes v. State · 33 Ala. App. 42 - Jackson v. State · 21 Ala. App. 295 - James v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Ordinarily, a general verdict is referable to a good count in the indictment which is supported by the evidence. This rule, however, is without application if the general affirmative charge is requested as to each count and the evidence does not warrant a submission of the case to the jury under each of the counts. A contrary holding would deprive the appellant of full review of a presented question. Hawes v. State, 216 Ala. 151 , 112 So. 761 ; Jones v. State, 236 Ala. 30 , 182 So. 404 ; Brasher v. State, 21 Ala.App. 309 , 107 So. 727 ; Jackson v. State, 33 Ala.App. 42 , 31 So.2d 514 , certiorari denied 249 Ala. 348 , 31 So.2d 519 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.