35 ALAAPP 639 - Shirley v. State

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1980

8 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

CARR, Presiding Judge.

¶1The accused was indicted on a single count charging larceny. After trial and conviction, his motion for a new trial was granted.

¶2At a subsequent time the defendant was reindicted for larceny of the same property and to the latter indictment were added counts charging buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing the property.

¶3To the second indictment defendant entered a plea of former jeopardy. This was not sustained and then the accused pleaded guilty to buying, etc., the property in question.

¶4The only matter of critical concern on this appeal is whether a conviction on a charge of larceny alone is a bar to a subsequent prosecution for buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in the concealment of the identical property which forms the basis of the larceny charge in the first indictment.

¶5The authorities are committed to the view that it is not. Foster v. State, 39 Ala. 229.

¶6A plea of former jeopardy is unavailable unless the offense presently charged is the same in law and fact as the former one. Holcomb v. State, 19 Ala.App. 24, 94 So. 917; Blevins v. State, 20 Ala.App. 229, 101 So. 478; Johns v. State, 13 Ala.App. 283, 69 So. 259.

¶7The judgment below is ordered affirmed.

¶8Affirmed.